<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 112 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368146</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the Order-in-Original on the valuation of imported goods. It reinstated the primary Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, emphasizing adherence to Customs Valuation Rules and the consistency of the pricing mechanism accepted in previous orders. The Tribunal criticized the lack of substantial reasoning by the Commissioner and highlighted the limited relevance of NIDB data in determining assessable value. The judgment aimed to maintain consistency in valuation practices and uphold the finality of accepted mechanisms, emphasizing the importance of analyzing financial data and transaction details beyond goods&#039; price.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 112 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368146</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the Order-in-Original on the valuation of imported goods. It reinstated the primary Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order, emphasizing adherence to Customs Valuation Rules and the consistency of the pricing mechanism accepted in previous orders. The Tribunal criticized the lack of substantial reasoning by the Commissioner and highlighted the limited relevance of NIDB data in determining assessable value. The judgment aimed to maintain consistency in valuation practices and uphold the finality of accepted mechanisms, emphasizing the importance of analyzing financial data and transaction details beyond goods&#039; price.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>