<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 109 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368143</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders enhancing the value, confiscating the goods, and imposing penalties on the appellants for mis-declaration of goods as steel scrap when they contained defective sheets/strips. The Tribunal emphasized the need to treat goods as scrap when requested for mutilation, aligning with legal precedents and expert opinions. The appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:21:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 109 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368143</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders enhancing the value, confiscating the goods, and imposing penalties on the appellants for mis-declaration of goods as steel scrap when they contained defective sheets/strips. The Tribunal emphasized the need to treat goods as scrap when requested for mutilation, aligning with legal precedents and expert opinions. The appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>