https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368138 Admission of the signature on the cheque, receipt of statutory notice without reply, and lack of acceptable evidence for the claim that a blank cheque issued in an earlier transaction was misused meant the presumption of liability under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 remained unrebutted. The closure of the account by itself did not defeat that presumption, and a revisional court would interfere only for gross illegality or perversity. Minor discrepancies in the complainant's evidence and a civil deposition relied on by the accused were insufficient to displace the conviction under Section 138, which was sustained. en-us Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:20:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368138 Admission of the signature on the cheque, receipt of statutory notice without reply, and lack of acceptable evidence for the claim that a blank cheque issued in an earlier transaction was misused meant the presumption of liability under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 remained unrebutted. The closure of the account by itself did not defeat that presumption, and a revisional court would interfere only for gross illegality or perversity. Minor discrepancies in the complainant's evidence and a civil deposition relied on by the accused were insufficient to displace the conviction under Section 138, which was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368138