<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 19 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14677</link>
    <description>The High Court held that activities such as investing money, earning interest, and generating rental income constituted a business activity for the assessee-firm, granting renewal of registration. The court emphasized the importance of genuine business engagement for firm existence and registration eligibility, ruling against the assessee based on the continuous nature of business activities required for classification as a business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 19 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14677</link>
      <description>The High Court held that activities such as investing money, earning interest, and generating rental income constituted a business activity for the assessee-firm, granting renewal of registration. The court emphasized the importance of genuine business engagement for firm existence and registration eligibility, ruling against the assessee based on the continuous nature of business activities required for classification as a business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>