<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 94 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal waived penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 by invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to confusion over the taxability of services provided to MSEDCL. The appeal was partly allowed based on this, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s genuine cause for not discharging Service Tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:20:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 94 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal waived penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 by invoking Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to confusion over the taxability of services provided to MSEDCL. The appeal was partly allowed based on this, acknowledging the appellant&#039;s genuine cause for not discharging Service Tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>