<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 92 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368126</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that running a collection center for processing exposed photo films did not constitute taxable photography services. The demand was deemed beyond the limitation period, with a portion agreed upon for payment. Penalties imposed were set aside due to the absence of mala fide intent. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 92 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368126</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining that running a collection center for processing exposed photo films did not constitute taxable photography services. The demand was deemed beyond the limitation period, with a portion agreed upon for payment. Penalties imposed were set aside due to the absence of mala fide intent. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>