<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 90 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368124</link>
    <description>Taxable services supplied to SEZ units or developers for authorised operations are exempt when they are wholly consumed within the SEZ, because the substantive exemption under the SEZ Act prevails over procedural service tax notifications by virtue of the Act&#039;s overriding effect. The exemption was supported by invoices, log sheets, contracts and declarations showing use in the SEZ, and substantial compliance with notification conditions was accepted. Routing the services through contractors or sub-contractors did not, by itself, defeat the exemption, since the decisive factor was the nature and end use of the services in authorised SEZ operations. On that basis, the service tax demand, with interest and penalties, was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 90 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368124</link>
      <description>Taxable services supplied to SEZ units or developers for authorised operations are exempt when they are wholly consumed within the SEZ, because the substantive exemption under the SEZ Act prevails over procedural service tax notifications by virtue of the Act&#039;s overriding effect. The exemption was supported by invoices, log sheets, contracts and declarations showing use in the SEZ, and substantial compliance with notification conditions was accepted. Routing the services through contractors or sub-contractors did not, by itself, defeat the exemption, since the decisive factor was the nature and end use of the services in authorised SEZ operations. On that basis, the service tax demand, with interest and penalties, was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>