<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 85 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties under sections 77 and 78 but upheld the service tax demand and interest for construction of residential complex services. The appellant&#039;s lack of fraudulent intent and payment before adjudication led to penalties being waived under Section 80. Compliance with service tax liabilities was emphasized, even in cases of inadvertent non-payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:20:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 85 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside penalties under sections 77 and 78 but upheld the service tax demand and interest for construction of residential complex services. The appellant&#039;s lack of fraudulent intent and payment before adjudication led to penalties being waived under Section 80. Compliance with service tax liabilities was emphasized, even in cases of inadvertent non-payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>