<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 82 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368116</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of Anant Steel Pvt. Ltd. (ASPL) and other appellants in a case involving alleged suppression of production and clandestine removal of finished goods. The Tribunal determined that the reliance on private records and statements was insufficient, ASPL&#039;s production capacity did not align with the alleged quantities, denial of cross-examination was unjustified, lack of corroborative evidence regarding clandestine activities, and penalties imposed were unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal nullified the penalties and set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalties, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and the right to cross-examination in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:19:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 82 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368116</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of Anant Steel Pvt. Ltd. (ASPL) and other appellants in a case involving alleged suppression of production and clandestine removal of finished goods. The Tribunal determined that the reliance on private records and statements was insufficient, ASPL&#039;s production capacity did not align with the alleged quantities, denial of cross-examination was unjustified, lack of corroborative evidence regarding clandestine activities, and penalties imposed were unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal nullified the penalties and set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalties, emphasizing the importance of corroborative evidence and the right to cross-examination in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>