<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 48 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14675</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the Tribunal erred in adding Rs. 12,728 to the income without considering detailed explanations and cash flow documents. The Court emphasized that relevant documents showing funds availability for the jewellery purchase should have been considered. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues, disposing of the reference with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 48 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14675</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that the Tribunal erred in adding Rs. 12,728 to the income without considering detailed explanations and cash flow documents. The Court emphasized that relevant documents showing funds availability for the jewellery purchase should have been considered. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all three issues, disposing of the reference with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>