https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368113 The Tribunal allowed all five appeals, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner(Appeals) and the Commissioner. The appellant's product was classified as chewing tobacco under heading 24039910, and the differential duty, interest, and penalties imposed on the basis of it being Jarda scented tobacco were deemed unjustified. The decision was supported by the appellant's manufacturing process, the lack of scent in the product, and the absence of substantial evidence from the Revenue to prove otherwise. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Nov 2019 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368113 The Tribunal allowed all five appeals, setting aside the orders of the Commissioner(Appeals) and the Commissioner. The appellant's product was classified as chewing tobacco under heading 24039910, and the differential duty, interest, and penalties imposed on the basis of it being Jarda scented tobacco were deemed unjustified. The decision was supported by the appellant's manufacturing process, the lack of scent in the product, and the absence of substantial evidence from the Revenue to prove otherwise. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368113