<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1618 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee by directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to exclude certain comparables for Transfer Pricing adjustments and re-evaluate others. In terms of computation under Section 10A, the Assessing Officer was instructed to exclude specific expenses from both export turnover and total turnover. The issue of disallowance of leave encashment under Section 43B(f) was remitted back to the AO pending the Supreme Court&#039;s final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 07:07:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1618 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee by directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to exclude certain comparables for Transfer Pricing adjustments and re-evaluate others. In terms of computation under Section 10A, the Assessing Officer was instructed to exclude specific expenses from both export turnover and total turnover. The issue of disallowance of leave encashment under Section 43B(f) was remitted back to the AO pending the Supreme Court&#039;s final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>