https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275419 The Supreme Court held that permission of the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) was not required for the sale of a plot declared as 'Chakout' and outside the consolidation scheme. The Court found that the learned Single Judge did not exceed the scope of review and was justified in reconsidering the matter. As the suit property was not part of the consolidation scheme, Section 5 of the Act did not apply, and no permission was necessary for its sale. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the judgment of the learned Single Judge, and the status quo was vacated. en-us Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Oct 2018 07:07:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275419 The Supreme Court held that permission of the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) was not required for the sale of a plot declared as 'Chakout' and outside the consolidation scheme. The Court found that the learned Single Judge did not exceed the scope of review and was justified in reconsidering the matter. As the suit property was not part of the consolidation scheme, Section 5 of the Act did not apply, and no permission was necessary for its sale. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the judgment of the learned Single Judge, and the status quo was vacated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275419