https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275407 The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's decision and restored the single judge's decree in a partition and recovery case. Defendants 1 to 3 failed to prove their claim of permanent tenancy rights over specific portions of the property. The Court found the documentary evidence insufficient to support the permanent lease assertion, emphasizing that long occupation and rent payment did not establish permanent tenancy. The appeal was allowed with costs, affirming the lack of evidence for permanent tenancy rights. en-us Thu, 25 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Oct 2018 15:35:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275407 The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's decision and restored the single judge's decree in a partition and recovery case. Defendants 1 to 3 failed to prove their claim of permanent tenancy rights over specific portions of the property. The Court found the documentary evidence insufficient to support the permanent lease assertion, emphasizing that long occupation and rent payment did not establish permanent tenancy. The appeal was allowed with costs, affirming the lack of evidence for permanent tenancy rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Nov 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275407