<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 1002 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275402</link>
    <description>The Central Government retained the statutory power to determine the remuneration of Regional Rural Bank employees under Section 17(1) of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, and that power was not displaced by an award securing parity with sponsor-bank employees for the then-prevailing pay structure. The award did not create an automatic, perpetual escalation mechanism linking Regional Rural Bank pay to future bipartite settlements of commercial bank employees. Once the award had attained finality and been implemented, financial incapacity of the banks was not a decisive factor. The proper course was for the Central Government to revise remuneration promptly after later commercial bank revisions, while maintaining the parity contemplated by the award.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 1002 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275402</link>
      <description>The Central Government retained the statutory power to determine the remuneration of Regional Rural Bank employees under Section 17(1) of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976, and that power was not displaced by an award securing parity with sponsor-bank employees for the then-prevailing pay structure. The award did not create an automatic, perpetual escalation mechanism linking Regional Rural Bank pay to future bipartite settlements of commercial bank employees. Once the award had attained finality and been implemented, financial incapacity of the banks was not a decisive factor. The proper course was for the Central Government to revise remuneration promptly after later commercial bank revisions, while maintaining the parity contemplated by the award.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>