<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 52 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, finding the assessee had a reasonable cause for non-compliance with section 269T. It held that the penalty under section 271E was not sustainable, emphasizing the impracticality of repaying loans through specified modes when funds were utilized for business purposes, deeming repayment an &quot;empty formality.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 09:14:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 52 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, finding the assessee had a reasonable cause for non-compliance with section 269T. It held that the penalty under section 271E was not sustainable, emphasizing the impracticality of repaying loans through specified modes when funds were utilized for business purposes, deeming repayment an &quot;empty formality.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>