<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 48 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368082</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner liberty to submit a detailed representation before the Nodal Officer, who is to forward it to the competent redressal committee for decision under the relevant GST circular. The operative effect is that the grievance is to be examined through the prescribed administrative mechanism rather than through immediate adjudication in the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 48 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368082</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the petition by granting the petitioner liberty to submit a detailed representation before the Nodal Officer, who is to forward it to the competent redressal committee for decision under the relevant GST circular. The operative effect is that the grievance is to be examined through the prescribed administrative mechanism rather than through immediate adjudication in the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>