<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 18 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14664</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing exemption u/s 23(1)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a property in Green Park Extension, New Delhi. The Court emphasized that the building was constructed as a residential unit in a residential area, despite temporary office use. It highlighted the importance of the constructor&#039;s intention at the time of erection and construed exemption provisions strictly, with the burden on the taxpayer to prove entitlement. The Court differentiated the case from a Calcutta High Court decision and ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the exemption claim against the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:21:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 18 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14664</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing exemption u/s 23(1)(b)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for a property in Green Park Extension, New Delhi. The Court emphasized that the building was constructed as a residential unit in a residential area, despite temporary office use. It highlighted the importance of the constructor&#039;s intention at the time of erection and construed exemption provisions strictly, with the burden on the taxpayer to prove entitlement. The Court differentiated the case from a Calcutta High Court decision and ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the exemption claim against the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>