https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368071 The court modified the Provisional Attachment and Eviction Orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, limiting the attachment to a specific amount and excluding most of the property from the orders. Both parties agreed that the orders should only apply to properties owned by DAPL, not the petitioner. The court considered the petitioner's lease of the property where Jalsa Mall was developed through a joint venture, acknowledging details provided by the petitioner. The judgment was passed with the parties' consent, disposing of the petition and related application, canceling the next hearing date. en-us Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Sep 2018 11:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368071 The court modified the Provisional Attachment and Eviction Orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, limiting the attachment to a specific amount and excluding most of the property from the orders. Both parties agreed that the orders should only apply to properties owned by DAPL, not the petitioner. The court considered the petitioner's lease of the property where Jalsa Mall was developed through a joint venture, acknowledging details provided by the petitioner. The judgment was passed with the parties' consent, disposing of the petition and related application, canceling the next hearing date. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368071