<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 21 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368055</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order based on revenue neutrality, emphasizing the importance of addressing valuation issues. The Court found the Appeal not maintainable under Section 35G and advised the Revenue to seek remedy from the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 21 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368055</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order based on revenue neutrality, emphasizing the importance of addressing valuation issues. The Court found the Appeal not maintainable under Section 35G and advised the Revenue to seek remedy from the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>