<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 12 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368046</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands and orders against the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering exemption notifications in determining duty liabilities for goods cleared by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) to Domestic Tariff Area (DTA), particularly in the context of Countervailing Duty (CVD) calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 12 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368046</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demands and orders against the appellant. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering exemption notifications in determining duty liabilities for goods cleared by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) to Domestic Tariff Area (DTA), particularly in the context of Countervailing Duty (CVD) calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>