https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368043 The Tribunal considered four appeals challenging the demand of excise duty, interest, and penalty. The Registry objected to two cases for not meeting the mandatory predeposit under Section 35F. The appellants argued they had paid more than 7.5% of the duty. The Tribunal reviewed prior cases and payment details, finding the 1% duty payment sufficient for the predeposit. It emphasized consistency in treatment, considered circulars, and directed the appellants to file for condonation of delay for late appeals. Ultimately, the Tribunal vacated the objections, clarifying predeposit requirements and addressing delayed filings. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:40:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368043 The Tribunal considered four appeals challenging the demand of excise duty, interest, and penalty. The Registry objected to two cases for not meeting the mandatory predeposit under Section 35F. The appellants argued they had paid more than 7.5% of the duty. The Tribunal reviewed prior cases and payment details, finding the 1% duty payment sufficient for the predeposit. It emphasized consistency in treatment, considered circulars, and directed the appellants to file for condonation of delay for late appeals. Ultimately, the Tribunal vacated the objections, clarifying predeposit requirements and addressing delayed filings. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368043