<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 3 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority. The appellant was not provided with necessary documents and was deprived of the opportunity to defend due to the ex-parte order. Procedural fairness and thorough examination of documentary evidence were emphasized, requiring a reevaluation with proper access to documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 08:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 3 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and remanded the case to the original adjudicating authority. The appellant was not provided with necessary documents and was deprived of the opportunity to defend due to the ex-parte order. Procedural fairness and thorough examination of documentary evidence were emphasized, requiring a reevaluation with proper access to documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>