https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275388 Tax appeals were rejected because the Gujarat HC found that the Tribunal's order did not give rise to any substantial question of law, relying on its prior order in Tax Appeal Nos. 449 of 2000. The absence of a substantial question of law meant the appeals were not entertained. On costs, the Court exercised its discretion and directed that each party bear its own costs, making no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 25 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Oct 2018 06:39:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275388 Tax appeals were rejected because the Gujarat HC found that the Tribunal's order did not give rise to any substantial question of law, relying on its prior order in Tax Appeal Nos. 449 of 2000. The absence of a substantial question of law meant the appeals were not entertained. On costs, the Court exercised its discretion and directed that each party bear its own costs, making no order as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 25 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275388