https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275386 The appeal was dismissed because it was delayed by 191 days and no satisfactory explanation for the delay was offered. The Supreme Court treated limitation as the ining ground and did not admit the appeal. Although counsel was heard, the Court was not satisfied that the matter deserved admission, so the appeal failed solely on limitation. en-us Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Sep 2018 18:43:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275386 The appeal was dismissed because it was delayed by 191 days and no satisfactory explanation for the delay was offered. The Supreme Court treated limitation as the ining ground and did not admit the appeal. Although counsel was heard, the Court was not satisfied that the matter deserved admission, so the appeal failed solely on limitation. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275386