<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 662 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275375</link>
    <description>Trailers and loaders used in the business of running them on hire qualified for depreciation at the higher 40% rate under the applicable schedule. The decisive factual finding was that the assessee had earned transportation income and had in fact used the assets in a hire-running business; on that admitted basis, the court found no perversity in the finding below and held that no substantial question of law arose for interference. Depreciation at 40% was therefore rightly allowed on the trailers and loaders, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:37:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 662 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275375</link>
      <description>Trailers and loaders used in the business of running them on hire qualified for depreciation at the higher 40% rate under the applicable schedule. The decisive factual finding was that the assessee had earned transportation income and had in fact used the assets in a hire-running business; on that admitted basis, the court found no perversity in the finding below and held that no substantial question of law arose for interference. Depreciation at 40% was therefore rightly allowed on the trailers and loaders, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>