<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 57 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14651</link>
    <description>Section 52(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held inapplicable where the Tribunal found no material showing that the declared sale consideration was false or that any additional amount had been received over and above what was disclosed. Applying the governing interpretation of section 52(2), the Court accepted that the provision could not be invoked when the consideration stated by the assessee was genuine and accurate. The assessee&#039;s case for the assessment year 1970-71 therefore did not attract section 52(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:32:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 57 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14651</link>
      <description>Section 52(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held inapplicable where the Tribunal found no material showing that the declared sale consideration was false or that any additional amount had been received over and above what was disclosed. Applying the governing interpretation of section 52(2), the Court accepted that the provision could not be invoked when the consideration stated by the assessee was genuine and accurate. The assessee&#039;s case for the assessment year 1970-71 therefore did not attract section 52(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>