<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1764 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368028</link>
    <description>Technical glitches in filing Form GST TRAN-1 were addressed through the prescribed grievance redressal mechanism under Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST. The court directed that the petitioner&#039;s representation concerning inability to upload the form be forwarded by the jurisdictional officer to the Nodal Officer, so that the grievance could be placed before the Grievance Committee. The mechanism was to be followed for an appropriate decision within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1764 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368028</link>
      <description>Technical glitches in filing Form GST TRAN-1 were addressed through the prescribed grievance redressal mechanism under Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST. The court directed that the petitioner&#039;s representation concerning inability to upload the form be forwarded by the jurisdictional officer to the Nodal Officer, so that the grievance could be placed before the Grievance Committee. The mechanism was to be followed for an appropriate decision within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>