<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1756 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that no disallowance was necessary under section 14A as the assessee did not earn any dividend income in the relevant year. This decision overturned the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeal of the assessee, based on the precedent that no disallowance is needed under section 14A when no dividend income is earned. The ruling was issued on 26th September 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2018 06:48:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1756 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that no disallowance was necessary under section 14A as the assessee did not earn any dividend income in the relevant year. This decision overturned the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeal of the assessee, based on the precedent that no disallowance is needed under section 14A when no dividend income is earned. The ruling was issued on 26th September 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>