<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1752 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368016</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the notice u/s 148 as it was issued beyond the two-year limitation period under section 149(3) before the Finance Act 2012 amendment. Emphasizing adherence to statutory time limits and legal principles, the ITAT annulled the assessment, highlighting the importance of procedural compliance and statutory interpretation in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2018 06:48:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1752 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368016</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the notice u/s 148 as it was issued beyond the two-year limitation period under section 149(3) before the Finance Act 2012 amendment. Emphasizing adherence to statutory time limits and legal principles, the ITAT annulled the assessment, highlighting the importance of procedural compliance and statutory interpretation in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>