<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1748 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368012</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order, ruling that it was completed within a reasonable timeframe and did not violate natural justice principles. It held that the notice under section 143(2) was not required as the assessee failed to file a return of income. The additions under section 68 were deemed justified as the deposits were explained as advances received against the sale of plots. The Tribunal also confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s powers to make additions and dismissed the assessee&#039;s arguments regarding the availability of cash for unexplained deposits and verification of returned advances. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the assessment order and additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2018 06:48:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1748 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368012</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order, ruling that it was completed within a reasonable timeframe and did not violate natural justice principles. It held that the notice under section 143(2) was not required as the assessee failed to file a return of income. The additions under section 68 were deemed justified as the deposits were explained as advances received against the sale of plots. The Tribunal also confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s powers to make additions and dismissed the assessee&#039;s arguments regarding the availability of cash for unexplained deposits and verification of returned advances. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the assessment order and additions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>