<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 7 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14645</link>
    <description>Whether a commission payable as a percentage of net profits to a managing director falls within &quot;remuneration&quot; was resolved by distinguishing statutory language and prior authorities: the court held such profit-linked commission is not remuneration under section 40(c), for the assessee. The unit for computing allowance under rule 6D is each trip, not the whole year, favouring the Revenue. Payments for techno economic feasibility studies and preliminary geological surveys were held revenue in nature under section 37 because they produced no enduring capital asset and had a direct nexus with existing business, favouring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 7 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14645</link>
      <description>Whether a commission payable as a percentage of net profits to a managing director falls within &quot;remuneration&quot; was resolved by distinguishing statutory language and prior authorities: the court held such profit-linked commission is not remuneration under section 40(c), for the assessee. The unit for computing allowance under rule 6D is each trip, not the whole year, favouring the Revenue. Payments for techno economic feasibility studies and preliminary geological surveys were held revenue in nature under section 37 because they produced no enduring capital asset and had a direct nexus with existing business, favouring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>