<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1740 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368004</link>
    <description>The ITAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal, ruling that no penalty under section 272A(2)(k) was leviable due to the reasonable cause shown by the assessee. The tribunal found that the delay in filing the TDS returns was not due to contumacious conduct but rather a genuine misunderstanding regarding TDS responsibilities. The penalty was directed to be deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2018 06:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1740 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368004</link>
      <description>The ITAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal, ruling that no penalty under section 272A(2)(k) was leviable due to the reasonable cause shown by the assessee. The tribunal found that the delay in filing the TDS returns was not due to contumacious conduct but rather a genuine misunderstanding regarding TDS responsibilities. The penalty was directed to be deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>