<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1733 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367997</link>
    <description>SC upheld the validity of the Aadhaar project and Aadhaar Act against privacy challenges. The court held that Aadhaar&#039;s architecture does not create a surveillance state as it operates in a purpose-blind manner, collecting only minimal biometric data without transaction details, purpose, or location information. The system includes sufficient security measures making it difficult to create individual profiles from stored biometric and demographic data in CIDR.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2025 11:49:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1733 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367997</link>
      <description>SC upheld the validity of the Aadhaar project and Aadhaar Act against privacy challenges. The court held that Aadhaar&#039;s architecture does not create a surveillance state as it operates in a purpose-blind manner, collecting only minimal biometric data without transaction details, purpose, or location information. The system includes sufficient security measures making it difficult to create individual profiles from stored biometric and demographic data in CIDR.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>