https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367986 The Tribunal remanded the demand under "Renting of Immovable Property Service" for reconsideration. The demand under "Management or Business Consultancy Services" was upheld. The demands under "Real Estate Agents Service" and "Business Auxiliary Service" were set aside. The disallowance of Cenvat credit on input services was also set aside. Penalties related to "Real Estate Agents Service," "Business Auxiliary Service," and wrongly availed Cenvat credit were consequently set aside. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential reliefs and partly remanded. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Sep 2018 06:46:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367986 The Tribunal remanded the demand under "Renting of Immovable Property Service" for reconsideration. The demand under "Management or Business Consultancy Services" was upheld. The demands under "Real Estate Agents Service" and "Business Auxiliary Service" were set aside. The disallowance of Cenvat credit on input services was also set aside. Penalties related to "Real Estate Agents Service," "Business Auxiliary Service," and wrongly availed Cenvat credit were consequently set aside. The appeal was partly allowed with consequential reliefs and partly remanded. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367986