<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1186 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275365</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 12,50,000 imposed under section 271AAA on undisclosed income. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty was dismissed as the Tribunal found that since the assessee was covered only by a survey under section 133A and not a search under section 132, the penalty under section 271AAA was legally incorrect. The order was pronounced on February 5, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:09:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1186 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275365</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty of Rs. 12,50,000 imposed under section 271AAA on undisclosed income. The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of the penalty was dismissed as the Tribunal found that since the assessee was covered only by a survey under section 133A and not a search under section 132, the penalty under section 271AAA was legally incorrect. The order was pronounced on February 5, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>