<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1532 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275372</link>
    <description>The court declined to issue a direction for the implementation of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order due to the respondent&#039;s statutory right to appeal under the Customs Act. The court disposed of the writ petition, stating that if the respondent does not file an appeal within the prescribed time, they must implement the Tribunal&#039;s order within one week after the limitation period expires. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1532 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275372</link>
      <description>The court declined to issue a direction for the implementation of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order due to the respondent&#039;s statutory right to appeal under the Customs Act. The court disposed of the writ petition, stating that if the respondent does not file an appeal within the prescribed time, they must implement the Tribunal&#039;s order within one week after the limitation period expires. No costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>