<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1707 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367971</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondents to file a statutory appeal within two weeks, balancing the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to provisional release and the respondent&#039;s right to appeal under the Customs Act. Failure to appeal would result in implementing the CESTAT order for provisional release of goods, ensuring timely resolution without undue delays. The Court emphasized the importance of upholding statutory appeal rights while addressing the petitioner&#039;s concerns for compliance with the CESTAT order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:09:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1707 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367971</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondents to file a statutory appeal within two weeks, balancing the petitioner&#039;s entitlement to provisional release and the respondent&#039;s right to appeal under the Customs Act. Failure to appeal would result in implementing the CESTAT order for provisional release of goods, ensuring timely resolution without undue delays. The Court emphasized the importance of upholding statutory appeal rights while addressing the petitioner&#039;s concerns for compliance with the CESTAT order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>