<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1706 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the Indian subsidiary of Huntsman International LLC. It remanded the issue of disallowance of corporate service charges to the DRP for fresh adjudication, allowed the claim of depreciation on intangibles, and deleted the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal referred to its prior decisions and emphasized the need for detailed reasoning in the fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 20:08:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1706 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by the Indian subsidiary of Huntsman International LLC. It remanded the issue of disallowance of corporate service charges to the DRP for fresh adjudication, allowed the claim of depreciation on intangibles, and deleted the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal referred to its prior decisions and emphasized the need for detailed reasoning in the fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>