<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1085 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275354</link>
    <description>The Delhi Professional Colleges Act, 2007 was treated as a complete code for admissions in unaided non-minority professional institutions in Delhi, so executive action could not displace its statutory reservation and merit scheme; the Government&#039;s exemption for wards of army personnel was therefore ultra vires. A non-minority unaided professional institution could not confine admissions to a self-defined private source and had to keep non-reserved admissions open to the general pool on inter se merit. Clause (5) of Article 15 was held to be a valid enabling provision that does not violate the basic structure and supports constitutionally valid reservations in private unaided educational institutions, other than minority institutions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 09:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1085 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275354</link>
      <description>The Delhi Professional Colleges Act, 2007 was treated as a complete code for admissions in unaided non-minority professional institutions in Delhi, so executive action could not displace its statutory reservation and merit scheme; the Government&#039;s exemption for wards of army personnel was therefore ultra vires. A non-minority unaided professional institution could not confine admissions to a self-defined private source and had to keep non-reserved admissions open to the general pool on inter se merit. Clause (5) of Article 15 was held to be a valid enabling provision that does not violate the basic structure and supports constitutionally valid reservations in private unaided educational institutions, other than minority institutions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>