<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1702 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367966</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding the cricket association liable as a representative assessee for income arising in India for foreign cricket boards. The tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, affirming the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions. The case clarified tax liability, interpreted key sections of the Income Tax Act, emphasized representative assessee responsibilities, and referenced legal precedents to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1702 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367966</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding the cricket association liable as a representative assessee for income arising in India for foreign cricket boards. The tribunal&#039;s decision was set aside, affirming the Assessing Officer and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions. The case clarified tax liability, interpreted key sections of the Income Tax Act, emphasized representative assessee responsibilities, and referenced legal precedents to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>