https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367961 The court dismissed the Department's petitions challenging the Settlement Commission's orders. It held that the Department lacked locus standi to challenge the rejection of the settlement application for certain years, as the remedy under the Income Tax Act is provided to the assessee, not the Department. The court found that the Settlement Commission's decisions were within its jurisdiction, did not violate the Act, and were procedurally sound. It emphasized the limited scope of judicial review and upheld the Settlement Commission's orders, rejecting the Department's challenges. en-us Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Dec 2018 12:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367961 The court dismissed the Department's petitions challenging the Settlement Commission's orders. It held that the Department lacked locus standi to challenge the rejection of the settlement application for certain years, as the remedy under the Income Tax Act is provided to the assessee, not the Department. The court found that the Settlement Commission's decisions were within its jurisdiction, did not violate the Act, and were procedurally sound. It emphasized the limited scope of judicial review and upheld the Settlement Commission's orders, rejecting the Department's challenges. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367961