<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1676 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the notification increasing export duty did not come into force on the date of issuance. The demand for higher duty was deemed unjustified, and the impugned order was set aside, granting relief to the appellant. The decision was influenced by the legal interpretation of Section 25 of the Customs Act, emphasizing the importance of timely notification publication as established in relevant case laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 15:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1676 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the notification increasing export duty did not come into force on the date of issuance. The demand for higher duty was deemed unjustified, and the impugned order was set aside, granting relief to the appellant. The decision was influenced by the legal interpretation of Section 25 of the Customs Act, emphasizing the importance of timely notification publication as established in relevant case laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>