https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367939 The Tribunal corrected an apparent clerical error in its Final Order by substituting the recorded number of imported Electrical Multiple Units from 25 to 28 in paragraph 2. The mistake was confined to the factual recital and was treated as a typographical error apparent on the face of the record. No substantive issue on classification or merits was affected. The rectification and review applications were accordingly allowed, and the impugned order was modified to reflect the correct number of EMUs. en-us Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:13:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367939 The Tribunal corrected an apparent clerical error in its Final Order by substituting the recorded number of imported Electrical Multiple Units from 25 to 28 in paragraph 2. The mistake was confined to the factual recital and was treated as a typographical error apparent on the face of the record. No substantive issue on classification or merits was affected. The rectification and review applications were accordingly allowed, and the impugned order was modified to reflect the correct number of EMUs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367939