<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Composition Scheme Benefit Still Valid Despite Late Intimation Filing for Service Tax Payment Eligibility.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41704</link>
    <description>Works contract - Composition Scheme - allegation is that the appellant cannot opt to pay service tax under the composition scheme for the reason that they have failed to file intimation prior to payment of service tax under the composition scheme - Benefit of composition cannot be denied merely for procedural lapse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:12:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:12:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Composition Scheme Benefit Still Valid Despite Late Intimation Filing for Service Tax Payment Eligibility.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41704</link>
      <description>Works contract - Composition Scheme - allegation is that the appellant cannot opt to pay service tax under the composition scheme for the reason that they have failed to file intimation prior to payment of service tax under the composition scheme - Benefit of composition cannot be denied merely for procedural lapse.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:12:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=41704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>