<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1666 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367930</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on reimbursable expenses and the wrong availment of CENVAT credit for non-taxable output services. Relying on legal precedents cited by the appellant&#039;s counsel, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that credits used for payment of duty not required to be paid do not need to be reversed. The impugned order was overturned, providing relief to the appellants in line with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:12:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1666 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367930</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax on reimbursable expenses and the wrong availment of CENVAT credit for non-taxable output services. Relying on legal precedents cited by the appellant&#039;s counsel, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that credits used for payment of duty not required to be paid do not need to be reversed. The impugned order was overturned, providing relief to the appellants in line with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>