<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1664 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order upholding the demand for service tax on &#039;Business Exhibition Service&#039; for the years 2002-03 and 2003-04, ruling that the demands were outside the scope of statutory provisions prevailing at that time. The appellant&#039;s argument that the services became taxable only from 10.09.2004 was accepted, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential benefits as per the law. The judgment emphasized the importance of correctly interpreting statutory provisions related to tax collection and deposit to the Central Government and highlighted the necessity of aligning tax demands with the prevailing statutory framework during the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1664 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order upholding the demand for service tax on &#039;Business Exhibition Service&#039; for the years 2002-03 and 2003-04, ruling that the demands were outside the scope of statutory provisions prevailing at that time. The appellant&#039;s argument that the services became taxable only from 10.09.2004 was accepted, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential benefits as per the law. The judgment emphasized the importance of correctly interpreting statutory provisions related to tax collection and deposit to the Central Government and highlighted the necessity of aligning tax demands with the prevailing statutory framework during the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>