<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1661 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s orders and allowed the appeals, ruling that the exempted portion under Notification No.4/2006 should not be included in the calculation for credit reversal related to Financial Leasing Services. The Tribunal determined that since Financial Leasing Services were taxable despite partial exemption, they did not qualify as &quot;exempted services&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and therefore, the exempted portion should not be considered in the credit reversal formula.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 08:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1661 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s orders and allowed the appeals, ruling that the exempted portion under Notification No.4/2006 should not be included in the calculation for credit reversal related to Financial Leasing Services. The Tribunal determined that since Financial Leasing Services were taxable despite partial exemption, they did not qualify as &quot;exempted services&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and therefore, the exempted portion should not be considered in the credit reversal formula.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>