<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1653 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367917</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for disallowance of CENVAT credit due to disproportionate distribution among units was not valid. The decision aligned with legal precedents and departmental circulars, emphasizing adherence to Rule 7 of the CENVAT Credit Rules and established case law, ultimately granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:11:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1653 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367917</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demand for disallowance of CENVAT credit due to disproportionate distribution among units was not valid. The decision aligned with legal precedents and departmental circulars, emphasizing adherence to Rule 7 of the CENVAT Credit Rules and established case law, ultimately granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>