https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367914 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that Red Mud should not be classified as excisable goods under the CET Act, 1985. Citing precedents and emphasizing the waste/residue nature of Red Mud, the Tribunal set aside the demands and penalties imposed by lower authorities, nullifying the application of penalties under Section 11AC of the CEA, 1944. This decision marked a significant victory for the appellants, as the Tribunal concluded that Red Mud did not meet the criteria for excisability, thereby reversing the earlier penalties and demands. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367914 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that Red Mud should not be classified as excisable goods under the CET Act, 1985. Citing precedents and emphasizing the waste/residue nature of Red Mud, the Tribunal set aside the demands and penalties imposed by lower authorities, nullifying the application of penalties under Section 11AC of the CEA, 1944. This decision marked a significant victory for the appellants, as the Tribunal concluded that Red Mud did not meet the criteria for excisability, thereby reversing the earlier penalties and demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367914